Tom LoBianco on politics, hot sauce, et al

Check here for updates on Indiana, Maryland and national politcs. I'll also throw in some thoughts on building a better habanero mash.

Careful with those poll numbers … Rasmussen on O’Malley and Ehrlich

with 3 comments

I’ll be talking about this at 1p on WYPR, but here’s a brief rundown on the new Rasmussen poll showing Bob Ehrlich and Martin O’Malley neck-in-neck (linked here):

- The poll shows O’Malley beating Ehrlich again, if the election were held today, 47-44.

- It shows strong approval for Ehrlich among men and for O’Malley among women.

- It also shows O’Malley with higher unfavorables than Ehrlich (no doubt a function of O’M being the incumbent.)

Some general critiques:
– Rasmussen only polled 500 likely voters. An excellent sample would be 1,000 likely voters and Gonzales Research, which has a long history in Maryland, typically does around 800 people.

So the margins are going to be bigger, making this either a lot tighter of race than the poll would have it appear, or a lot less close.

- Rasmussen’s robocall method of polling has drawn criticism because, among other things, it’s harder to judge the validity of your respondents than if you had a person asking the questions.

- All of that said, one national analyst, Nate Silver, has lauded Rasmussen’s national polling work.

- UPDATE: A reader took issue with the assessment that Nate Silver “lauded” Rasmussen and provided a link to this post. In the post, Silver lays out why Rasmussen’s polling methodology tends to favor Republicans. It’s a good read, tad esoteric, but worth the time as we are entering heavy-speculation and prognostication season.

About these ads

Written by tomlobianco

April 23, 2010 at 10:36 am

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I have to disagree with you on your characterization that Nate Silver “lauded” Rasmussen’s polling work. He has actually taken Ras to task for its methodology and its lack of transparency in its screening process.

    http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/use-of-likely-voter-model-does-not.html

    Thee is a decided “house effect” in the Rasmussen polls. If we account for that, we can safely assume O’Malley is leading by much more.

    IPFrehley

    April 23, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    • Mr./Ms. Frehley, thanks for the reply and link. I’m updating the post shortly to include that analysis. Do you have a non-prank name, so I can credit you with the find in the updated post?

      tomlobianco

      April 26, 2010 at 10:11 am

  2. Tom, PPP’s poll showed a 3 point lead for O’Malley with a robocall which is the same as Gonzalez’s poll out today. The issue is not so much if a call is live or automated, it it the sample they take from. 500 versus 1,000 is irrelevant in statistical purposes. But if you assume 30% African-American turnout over 25% over 20% that may greatly impact your results (22%=2006, 25%=2008). Or if you assume a great Dem then Rep or great women than male, etc. And that part of polling is a guessing game.

    Thomas the Tank Engine

    July 27, 2010 at 7:27 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: